The boss of one of Britain’s biggest electricals retailers has criticised government policy for “actively working against job creation” amid a raft of tax increases and looming worker rights reforms.

Writing in The Telegraph, Alex Baldock, the chief executive of Currys, said Labour risked making it “harder, riskier and more expensive to hire people” as Angela Rayner prepares to implement the Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through the House of Lords.

Mr Baldock said the retailer had already faced a 13pc overnight increase in the cost of employing part-time workers from Rachel Reeves’s £25bn National Insurance raid, while its property tax bill also rose.

He said Currys was now facing “new and counter-productive red tape in the shape of employment law changes”.

Mr Baldock added: “Smart people know that changing your mind in the face of compelling evidence is a sign of strength, not weakness.

“It’s not too late for the Government to change its mind on employment law changes that would lead to less employment.”

It comes amid growing warnings from bosses that the Government risks derailing its growth ambitions by piling higher taxes and more red tape on businesses.

In a recent poll by the Institute of Directors, a quarter of business leaders said the Employment Rights Bill made it likely that they would make redundancies.

Under the planned reforms, workers will be entitled to contracts with a minimum number of weekly hours baked in, giving them the same number of hours as they have worked in the recent past.

However, retail and hospitality chiefs have called for a rethink of the plans amid concerns that the changes risk stopping them from hiring extra people during crucial trading periods such as Christmas. Bosses have said they cannot afford to offer everyone more shifts all year round when stores are quieter.

Mr Baldock said businesses including Currys were “ready to play our part in getting Britain back to work”, adding: “Enlist us in this cause, don’t hammer us.”

In a House of Lords debate in April, Lord Wolfson, the boss of Next, said the employment rights reforms risked making it “almost impossible for businesses to offer additional voluntary hours to workers” because they could then end up overstaffed at some times of the year.

Lord Wolfson said: “There is a world of difference between tackling potentially abusive zero-hours contracts and eliminating the flexibility that legitimate part-time contracts provide to those who need and want them.”

The Government did not immediately respond to requests for comment. However, a spokesman previously said: “We’ve consulted extensively with business on our proposals, and we will continue to work closely with employers to ensure new laws work for them while putting money back into the pockets of working people.”